We Are Living In A Simulation. The 2025 Mysteries of the Buga Sphere
Accept this reality. The sphere breaks at least 3 laws of physics. It has been carbon dated from 12,500 years ago. Jesus supposedly died 2020 something years ago. It's like a real life Truman Show.
According to reports, the sphere was first spotted in the skies above Buga (in the Valle del Cauca region of Colombia) in early March 2025. New York Post+3Fox News+3Cybernews+3 Witnesses allegedly saw the object flying erratically (for example zig-zagging rather than falling straight) before it came to rest on the ground. New York Post+1 Once retrieved, it drew intense interest because of claims that:
-
it had no visible welds or joints, suggesting it was manufactured in one piece (if human-made at all). New York Post+2People.com+2
-
it weighed around 4.5 pounds (≈2 kg) when initially found — though different reports give different weights. Cybernews+1
-
its outer surface was cold to the touch, though the surrounding ground or air did not show equivalent cold. New York Post+1
-
the surface bears strange symbols and inscriptions that don’t correspond clearly to any known ancient writing system. Cybernews+1
In short: a metallic spherical object of unknown (or disputed) origin, with many odd properties reported, found (or claimed to be found) in Colombia in 2025.
Dating & material claims
One of the more dramatic claims about the Buga Sphere is that it has been carbon-dated to an age of around 12,560 years. For example, one write-up states that microscopic material from the object was submitted to radiocarbon analysis at the University of Georgia and yielded a date around 10,560 BCE (≈12,560 years ago) for organic residues associated with the object. Medium+1
However — this is very important — there is strong debate and skepticism about this claim. Why? Because carbon-dating requires organic (carbon-based) material, and if the sample is contaminated, or if the organic sample doesn’t actually come from the object (but from nearby soil or later contact) the result may not reflect the object’s true age. The article itself mentions “critics say the soil found on the sphere may be contaminated or that organic material may have migrated downward.” Medium+1
So: the dating claim is out there and dramatic, but by no means independently confirmed or accepted by a peer-reviewed scientific publication (at least as of this writing).
“Breaking the laws of physics” & unusual behaviours
The reason this object has created so much buzz is that a number of claimed behaviours would appear to challenge our standard understanding of physics or material science. Some of the claims include:
-
Anti-gravitational or unusual weight change: Some observers say the sphere’s mass seems to change — for example increasing in weight after recovery. THE WELLSVILLE SUN+1 If true, this would be extremely extraordinary (since in normal physics, an object’s mass doesn’t just change unless material is added or removed).
-
Instant evaporation of water / thermal anomaly: One witness allegedly poured water on the object and the water vaporised or “smoked” instantly, suggesting the surface was at an extreme temperature or possessed exotic thermal properties. New York Post+1
-
Responds to sound or vibrations: There are claims (less well-documented) that the sphere vibrates or responds when sound waves (for example reciting Sanskrit chants) are applied. The Times of India
-
No visible manufacturing seams, internal micro-structures: X-ray scans apparently show internal features (micro-spheres, a “core” or “chip”-like element) all encased in the shell, with no visible join lines. For example, claims of “three layers” of material and 18 micro-spheres inside have been reported. The Sun+2New York Post+2
If all these claims were accurate and verified, they would suggest an object built with manufacturing technologies far beyond what is publicly known — or possibly using principles not currently understood (for example anti-gravity or exotic materials). That’s why many people treat this case as sensational.
Cautions & where things stand
It’s important to emphasise a few key caveats to keep everything in perspective:
-
Much of what is being reported comes via journalists, media outlets, ufology investigators, videos, and social-media more than via a standard scientific journal with peer-reviewed analysis.
-
Some of the claims (weight change, instant evaporation, anti-gravitational behaviour) are anecdotal at this stage and not documented in a replicable scientific experiment (or at least not publicly verified).
-
The carbon dating claim has not been widely validated or published in a credible scientific forum; there are questions about sample integrity and contamination risk.
-
Some experts are sceptical: for example, one scientist noted that the sphere could simply be a piece of modern art or a prop. Cybernews+1
-
Some investigations suggest this may be a hoax or a marketing stunt rather than an extraterrestrial device. For example, one article pointed to how this resembles previous episodes where mysterious “ancient mummies” or “alien artefacts” later turned out to be fabricated. The Economic Times
Why people are fascinated
Despite the uncertainties, the Buga Sphere captivates people for a few reasons:
-
The idea of a metallic sphere crashing or landing in a remote area and defying our expectations immediately evokes sci-fi and alien-technology tropes.
-
The combination of ancient inscriptions + advanced materials + unusual physics hits a sweet spot for mystery lovers.
-
If genuine, it could imply technology or physics far beyond current human capability — which would be paradigm-shifting.
-
Even if not genuine, it’s an interesting case study in how science, media, belief and speculation intersect — how humans deal with the unknown.
